Category Archives: Green Issues

Food, medicine, survival: why wildlife conservation is vital to us all

The delicate balance within eco-systems is the key to our future survival

Image: Bethan John @ Flickr

***

Wildlife protection is much bigger than the cuddly panda, despite the limelight it occupies in headline conservation news. The diversity of the natural world sustains us, allows us to adapt and innovate – ultimately it enables our continuing survival.

We rely on the natural world for a huge amount of resources; from the clothes we wear for warmth, to the food and medicines we depend on. Yet this reliance on natural resources too often becomes commercial abuse. Over the last few years the environmental debate has increasingly topped the agenda, influencing government policy and controlling the development of businesses.

Yet with its rising status, “green issues” has also become a buzzword; it’s enabled companies to wear a thin sheath of environmental protection to hide their central agenda for commercial development and financial gain.

Where’s the media storm?

The UN meeting on biodiversity next month is set to put conservation back onto the central agenda, yet it seems to have fallen at its first hurdle as the event has barely been visible in the headlines compared to the media storm surrounding the Copenhagen Summit last year. Speaking to the Guardian, Dr Robert Bloomfield, co-ordinator for the UK response to the International Year of Biodiversity, suggests that one reason for the lack of coverage given to the Convention on Biological Awareness in Nagoya is because biodiversity, compared to climate change, is a complex narrative that people struggle to grasp.

It’s easy to empathise with the plight of the panda and to understand the devastation that will be caused by climate change. However, biodiversity is intrinsically linked to climate change, as well as sustaining the habitats of the largest animals to the smallest micro-organism. The near destruction of the green sea turtle in the Caribbean is an example of the wider environmental devastation that can be caused by destabilising eco-systems.

Predator v prey

Diversity within eco-systems ensures stability and this is key to why biodiversity matters. If you were to take a predator out of an eco-system, it’d be difficult to predict the knock-on effect it’d have within the food chain due to the complexities of the inter-relationship between organisms (known as the trophic cascade).

Research has suggested that diverse ecosystems are better at supplying amenities like clean water, while diversity in crops offer better protection from new diseases and pests thereby better ensuring food security. Diversity within the natural world also inspires, allowing for innovation within new technologies and medicines.

Therefore not only is conservation vital, but as is finding a narrative that enables the public to understand the complexities of the natural world and how changes within it could dramatically impact their everyday lives.

Along with this self-interested argument for wildlife protection, there is a much more fundamental debate about the human psyche; during our time on this planet we have done untold damage to the natural world, isn’t it about time we started to conserve rather than destroy?

The answer to BP oil: China challenges the US as their electric car goes global

Can the fastest growing Chinese vehicle manufacturer offer an affordable solution to the industry’s oil dependency?

Image: etiennecoutu

As BP are faced with paying $2bn in compensation to victims of the Gulf oil spill, this environmental disaster is yet another horrifying signifier of the problems associated with oil. Yet could this be an energy Sputnik moment? Two important developing technology trends, that could point the way to the end of this oil dependency, are the drop in the cost of solar power and the downward cost curve in electric storage – car batteries. Battery-electric vehicles (EVs) are five times more energy-efficient than petrol-powered ones, while being five times cheaper to operate and maintain. The main problem with EVs is that their batteries, which account for 50 percent of the cost, are expensive. Lithium-ion battery costs about $1,000 (£690) per kilowatt-hour of electricity storage when fully installed.

Yet it seems that the fastest growing Chinese vehicle manufacturer, BYD Auto, has an affordable solution. Following the launch of its e6 electric car at Detroit auto show at the beginning of the year, on May 19 BYD’s public relations manager Du Guozhong announced that the model had passed all US safety tests including battery-related assessments. The electric car, with a 48-kilowatt-hour battery, is set to go on sale in the US by the end on the year, priced at $40,000. This means the battery would cost about $500 per kilowatt-hour, putting BYD years ahead of the downward cost curve.

Is this the challenge the US motor industry needs to move away from oil?

Image: Jochen Siegle/MotorShowNetwork

Who are BYD?

The company BYD (Build Your Dreams) started in 1995 as a battery manufacturer, and led the way in green technology by producing 100% recyclable batteries made from non-toxic electrolyte fluid. In 2003 it expanded into the automotive business; going on to launch eight models the company has enjoyed rapid growth. When they announced that they aimed to sell 800,000 units in the Chinese car market in 2010, after selling only 400,000 in 2009, many saw them as being unrealistically ambitious. Yet sales figures released for the first quarter of 2010 show that they’re on track; they sold 68,129 cars in March alone, a 99.3% increase on the same period last year, pushing them into third place on the Chinese car market sales board just below Shanghai VW and Shanghai GM.

In China, BYD cars are appealing as they have a good cost-benefit ratio; seen as being of better quality than other Chinese cars and cheaper than cars made by foreign manufacturers. Their expertise in battery technology awarded them the support of legendry American investor Warren Buffet, who brought 10 percent of the BYD Company in 2008. The CEO of the company, Wang Chuan-Fu, was so keen to prove his green credentials to Buffet’s business partner that he drank his own battery fluid. His point was if they were going to help solve green issues, they couldn’t create new environmental problems with their technology.

BYD successfully married their battery expertise with efficient manufacturing processes. Wang Chuan-Fu keeps manufacturing costs down in several ways: by employing a cheaper manual workforce rather than investing in machines; manufacturing all the various components in-house, from the seatbelts to the air conditioning; and granting himself a very modest wage that sees him living alongside his employees in the company’s purpose-built compound.

Safety at Stake

It was these efficiency savings that became BYD’s biggest hurdle as it tried to expand into the global market. Jim Federico, vehicle line engineer for Buick, has argued that while Chinese engineers are capable in single-skill areas like brakes, suspensions and wheels, they struggle when it comes to integrating all the systems in a complete vehicle. This has resulted in BYD’s failure to meet Euro NCAP crash tests.

Image: femaletrumpet02

Therefore, the news that BYD has passed the US safety test would suggest that there is nothing stopping the company expanding globally; this will come as much awaited good news for the Australian car dealer Denzel, which was so impressed by the company’s electric cars that for that last two years they have been eager to start importing them.

However, sceptics say that BYD’s battery cannot both be more powerful and cheaper than those made by competitors, and question the credibility of this announcement. Motoring journalist Eric Loveday said:

“Nearly everyone has been sceptical of the claims put forth by BYD from day one; from outrages range estimates, to production dates that simply couldn’t be met, and prices that seemed far too low to be reasonable. We don’t have any validation that points to actual test results, so needless to say, take BYD’s claim with a bit of caution and a shaker full of salt.”

Although BYD’s announcement is yet to be verified, sceptical or not no one can question their ambition; they are determined to become China’s largest automaker by 2015 and the world’s largest by 2025. An extremely important part of realising this ambition is to establish themselves as a world leader in the fast-growing solar power industry.

Can the sun suffice?

Using electric cars while their power comes from coal or nuclear means all this is achieving is shifting the pollution and the risk of industrial accidents onto other dirty energy sources. Luckily, the other key technology trend that could move us away from oil dependency is the rapid drop in the cost of solar power. Solar costs are projected to drop 80% over the next decade. This means that by 2020, unsubsidised solar power will be cheaper than subsidised coal, oil and nuclear.

As a result of the BP oil spill, a group of Florida businessmen created a website Solar Spill, to educate energy consumers about the potential of solar. They state:

“The sun ‘spills’ enough energy onto the Earth every four minutes to provide enough electricity to meet the needs of the world’s current population. This is not to say that 100% of the electricity should be from solar energy, but to advocate that a significant role can and should be played by solar power.”

Photovoltaic (PV) solar technology is improving fast, in terms of cost and efficiency. Dow Chemical Company, a global leader in sustainable chemical manufacture, announced in January that it would launch a line of solar PV shingle that would be widely available in 2011. They state that just by replacing old roofs with solar shingles instead of the asphalt ones, you could soon be generating solar power for less than 1 cent per kilowatt-hour. With the average American paying 10 cents per kilowatt-hour, they claim you’d be able to “fill up” your electric car for 53 cents.

In March, BYD demonstrated its commitment to become leaders in the field of solar panel technology when it started marketing the world’s first mass-produced dual mode electric vehicle, the F3DM, to private customers at the reduced price of 169,800 RMB ($24,800). The model has a solar panel charging system on the roof that transforms the solar power into electric power and stores it in a Fe battery.

This year, the Chinese government has stepped up its efforts to make electric cars a viable option for its populate; from announcing the introduction of state subsidies for those who pick green vehicles, to their plan to increase the number of electric charging stations across the country. Promoting electric car development is a way to curb surging demand for imported oil, which communist leaders see as a strategic weakness. David Sandalow, the assistant energy secretary for the US government has said:

“The Chinese are well positioned to be global leaders in the electric vehicle industry. I believe that we’ve got a lot to learn from each other, and that the world would benefit from us challenging each other in this industry.”

As Obama declared to end the “cosy relationship” between oil companies and US regulators, China challenges the US to become global leaders in EV technology. Is this the moment renewable energy campaigners have been waiting for? A move away from oil, as two superpowers battle to be green.

Haiti farmers protest against Monsanto hybrid seed

In protest over the 475 tons of hybrid corn and vegetable seeds that  Monsanto donated to Haitian farmers they burnt their land, while 10,000 people took to the streets on June 4 to voice their anger against the corporate giant in agricultural biotechnology. It’s time that global leaders listened and acted to support these farmers attempts to save their land and their future.

To keep up with the problems facing Haiti see  Al Jezeera English

Or follow the Monsanto seed debate online at MediaHacker or OtherWorldsArePossible or FreedomFood

Monsanto’s response to the protests against their hybrid seed donation to Haiti:

On May 13, Monsanto announced a donation of conventional corn and vegetable seeds to farmers in Haiti, to help increase food production and aid long-term earthquake recovery. A small group, utilizing online media, protested. At first they claimed Monsanto was donating genetically modified seed. Then they backed off and attacked the donation of hybrid seed. Then they claimed it was some kind of effort to slip GM seed into the country.

Imaginative, yes. Accurate, no.

Well if it’s accuracy we’re looking for, then that statement is not entirely true. Understandably there were concerns expressed – not just online but via broadcast and print media – that the seeds were genetically modified; Monsanto is the leading producer of genetically engineered (GE) seed (selling 90% of the US’ genetically engineered seeds), they are also openly experimenting in the use of terminator seeds. Is it no wonder that hundreds of people globally expressed their concern.

Haitian farmers struggle with sever shortage of crops (@flickr creative commons treesftf)

More importantly, this argument implies there is nothing wrong with introducing hybrid seeds into Haiti. Hybrids have been bred with an emphasis on yield at the expense of hardiness and resistance. Reliance on hybrid seeds enforces the use of chemical inputs;  their required fertilisers, pesticides and irrigation systems have trapped many of the world’s poorest farmers into a cycle of debt. The suicides in India are a devastating example of this. Yet Monsanto claim:

Our donation of hybrid seed to Haiti is about farmers, people and food. Haiti’s farmers need good quality seed, because the better the seed, the better the chances for more food from the same land. Haiti’s people need food — better quality food, more food and more nutritious food. We learned in Malawi that a donation of hybrid seed turned a region from a food aid recipient to a food exporter. Malawi farmers were given a chance to show what they could do with good seed. And they did it.

Haiti’s farmers can do the same thing.

That’s what the protesters aren’t saying.

No-one denies the improvements in Malawi’s agriculture, yet what conservationists across the world recognise – and what Monsanto refuses to acknowledge – is that hybrid seeds can be a short-term solution that causes devastating long-term consequences.

For an interesting article on the problems that face Malawi farmers see GRAIN (a small international non-profit organisation that works to support small farmers and social movements in their struggles for community-controlled and biodiversity-based food systems). Their support takes the form of independent research and analysis, networking at local, regional and international levels, and fostering new forms of cooperation and alliance-building.

Community battles council to keep Cardiff green

In all corners of Cardiff communities are campaigning to save their green areas. They’re angry that Cardiff County Council seems to be developing the city at the expense of the environment and the communities’ wellbeing. Yet are they simply making the tough decisions needed to ensure that the city continues as a thriving capital? From Rumney, to Bute Park, and St Mellons – here’s the update on the debate so far.

The disappearance of the capital's green areas is a growing concern for the people of Cardiff

Fighting for Rumney playing fields

A community campaign, the RREEL Action Group, is fighting to stop the council from building on Rumney Recreational Ground and Eastern Leisure Centre. The council plans to knock down two existing schools in the area, sell the land to developers, and build a new school on the playing fields.

Chairman of RREEL Action Group, Don Taylor, said:

“This is an exceptionally beautiful site. It’s an asset to the whole city, not just our community.”

Although they welcome a new school, many local residents feel that the council is putting financial gain before the community’s best interests. Politicians Alun Michael MP and Lorraine Barrett AM have also objected to the plans.

Despite this support, campaigners fear that the council will be successful with their planning application and the diggers will move in, just as they’ve done in Bute Park.

Battling over Bute Park’s dual identity

Bute Park has just been voted Wales's best park

Stretching out behind Cardiff castle is the historic Grade 1 listed Bute Park. It’s just been voted the best park in Wales, in Britain’s Best Park competition. Yet it’s not just a beautiful and tranquil haven, but is also host to some the best events in the city. From gigs to festivals, Bute Park has become the heart of a thriving capital.

It’s this dual identity that has caused conflict. The council’s been keen to make access to the park easier, especially for lorries when setting-up events. Their plans have been successful and the building of the new bridge and roadway has just got under-way.

Yet members of the Bute Parks Alliance (BPA) believe that Cardiff’s green areas should be protected and left untouched. BPA member, Gill Boden, said: “We have lost more than a third of our city centre parkland to development and privatisation already. Ongoing council plans to develop green areas in the city show that this erosion of our green lungs is not about to abate.”

This fear over the future destruction of green areas has recently hit the St Mellons community, as tension rises over whether a new A48 link road to Wentloog will be given the go ahead.

Will St Mellons’ Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) be saved?

St Mellons lies within a SSSI and local residents worry that the planned link road will be detrimental to the wildlife in the area. They also fear their health, safety and the value of their homes will all be affected. The Health Impact Assessment states that the link road would have a negative effect on the community, but no environmental evaluation has yet been published.

People are clearly concerned about the future of the Cardiff’s green areas. Yet there are communities throughout the city that are taking their future into their own hands by adopting a more sustainable lifestyle.

Cardiff communities grow together for a greener future

Encouraging people to "grow their own" has become an important part of the governments sustainable strategy

Recently the Swansea-born Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, warned that if we didn’t start addressing environmental issues then we’ll face a crisis of biblical proportions. He said people must change their lifestyle and that learning to “grow your own” is a key step towards a sustainable future. In order to achieve this he called for more land to be made available for thousands of new allotments across Britain.

In Cardiff, there are 857 people on the council’s waiting list for allotments, with the average wait for a plot being 12 months. But help is at hand for would-be green fingers. This winter Cardiff’s multi-award winning organisation, RCMA Social Enterprise, is to create a community run market garden.

RCMA already runs the award-winning producers’ markets in Riverside and Roath, community allotments in Pontcanna Fields and holds regular education activities in the community.

Award-winning Riverside market is cheaper than Tesco!

Simon Michaels, a director at RCMA, said:

“There has been a lot of political support for RCMA. Encouraging people to “grow their own” is very much at the heart of the sustainable strategies.”

Convincing people to live sustainable lifestyles is important, however unless major changes are made on a governmental level then we can’t begin addressing the environmental crisis. Councils are forced to make difficult and unpopular decisions; Cardiff must continue to develop, and improvements in housing and infrastructure are essential. Yet these decisions should not be made for financial gain at the expense of the environment. Local action groups are doing essential work in challenging the reasons behind the council’s policies.